Stay in touch with the show and market's latest news Subscribe to the newsletter. If you are human, leave this field blank. Unique by Mode City July 6, 7, 8 Paris. Interfiliere Shanghai September Shanghai. Young Label Awards September Shanghai. Your message. Your appointment details Wednesday Thursday Update these information. Your message has been sent to the Eurovet team for approval before it is sent to the brand. Make sure to check your email box regularly as you will receive an asnwer shorty! A summary table provides in concise form all of the key elements required to conjugate completely all French verbs.
Annex B provides an alphabetical index of 6, verbs, showing the model class to which each verb belongs. In this case the following order of chapters is suggested: 1—3, 5 7 8 9 10 6 11 4 Alternatively, the relatively new student may wish to concentrate initially on the presentation of verbs and verb forms in Annexes A and B, before venturing into the more analytical presentations in Parts I and II.
The mood of the verb does not refer at least directly to the mood of the speaker but rather to the type of statement that he or she is making. Contrary to what many might think, the subjunctive also exists in English, though its existence generally passes unnoticed, since subjunctive and indicative verb forms in Modern English are almost always the same. But a sentence like I insist that he be punished.
In addition there are a number of compound verb forms, most with close English counterparts. The table below illustrates basic English equivalents for the simple and principal compound French indicative verb forms. In each case the name in boldface e. To live is to love. He writes in the book.
Première visite chez un vigneron
He wrote a book about Shakespeare in When I was young I played baseball every day. When the phone rang I was leaving the house. Someday I will write a book about Shakespeare. If I were not so lazy, I would write a book about Shakespeare. I saw your brother crossing the street. The book, written in the Middle Ages, is now in the British Museum. He has written a number of best-sellers. By the age of 30, he had written a number of best-sellers. By the time I retire, I will have worked 40 years. I would have done it, if only I had had the chance. As we will see in Chapter 1, these four groups are traditionally reduced to three, based on the type of ending used in the present indicative.
It is now available in a CD-rom version, which also contains complete verb conjugations. The six-volume Grand Robert has an additional 3, verbs. Regular verbs are infrequently used. Frequently used verbs are irregular. There is actually a simple explanation apart from that of monsieur Murphy: frequently used verbs simply have much greater capacity to resist the constant pressure to become uniform.
Consider, for example, the English verb to crow, whose historical past tense was crew: Then began he to curse and to swear, saying, I know not the man. And immediately the cock crew. Yet the verb was so infrequently used that most people assumed, or were easily convinced, that the past tense must be crowed, and so it has become.
Revised Standard Version. Of course if one goes back far enough in the history of English and its predecessors , one will discover that most irregular verbs are really quite regular, following archaic patterns that have become obscured by several thousand years of gradual phonetic and other changes. In French a similar situation prevails, but with one important advantage: a very large number of seemingly irregular verbs follow easily understood and readily remembered patterns.
This applies in particu-. Additional Observations 1.
Etymology The common heritage of English and French—approximately 60 percent of English words have a Latin, often via French, origin— can be a useful tool for remembering certain irregularities that otherwise might appear mysterious. Via an Indo-European root common to Latin and the Germanic languages, it is also the same -l which appears in meal.
Pronunciation A number of irregularities—real or apparent— can only be understood by examining the correspondence between the written form and the actual pronunciation. Where a vowel is nasalized, as in savons and rompt, we include the succeeding consonant in the phonetic transcription to indicate this nasalization, rather than placing a tilde over the vowel as is customary. A common example of this is the feminine form of nouns and adjectives— e. At several points we will use the terminology open syllable and closed syllable.
An open syllable is one in which the vowel is the last spoken element— e. At various points, reference will be made to the number of verbs in a particular class— e. These numbers by themselves have no importance, since using a different set of verbs would produce an entirely different set of numbers. Nonetheless, the.
- ALCOOLISME LE PARLER VRAI LE PARLER SIMPLE HORS COLLECTION FRENCH EDITION Directory;
- Prelude Op.11 No.14 - Piano.
- Buy My Field, Jeremiah!
- OUR AWESOME SERVICES.
- Stories of Others: A Legacy of Remarkable People.
The notation 1s, 2s, 3s, 1p, 2p, and 3p will be used as follows: 1s 2s 3s. As early as possible, it is recommended that the student use a French-French dictionary. At a minimum one should learn to recognize its forms, something which can be accomplished with relatively little effort. However, since it is equally easy to learn— or at least recognize—why deny oneself the opportunity to appreciate classical French literature, in which its use was not infrequent? In many cases verbs which look similar e. For this reason we frequently provide information on the Latin or Old French word from which the modern verb is derived.
These generally correspond to well-known English words and hence can be a useful tool for helping to remember conjugations which might otherwise seem highly irregular. The infinitive stem is equal to the infinitive minus the final -er, -oir, -re, or -ir. For aller, two separate verbs have joined to form the present tense. Thus for the model verb parler the present tense is as follows: -e endings.
The three singulars and third person plural are pronounced identically. In Modern French as in Modern English , the coalescence of forms has made obligatory the use of personal pronouns, in contrast to the other major Romance languages Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian , in which personal pronouns are added only when emphasis is required. For a verb beginning with a consonant, it is impossible even with the use of personal pronouns to distinguish between the pronunciation of the third person singular and plural: donner adorer.
This is discussed further in the appendix to this chapter. The overall situation can be summarized as follows, where the numbers represent the number of verbs in each category Thus: 1 With two exceptions, -oir and -re verbs only use the basic -s endings.
For the large majority of these verbs the stem is non-uniform. Of the others, most use basic -s endings, while a relatively small number use -e endings. For further information on the historical reasons for the existence of multiple stems and endings, see the appendix to this chapter. Of the verbs presented in Le Petit Robert. In the large majority of cases, compounds e. Asservir is not a compound form of servir but is instead derived from serf. Note that unlike Class I -er verbs, the third person plural can always be distinguished from the third person singular, even for verbs beginning with consonants: il durcit.
Other verbs ending in -illir are Class II verbs, apart from bouillir, which has -s endings and separate stems for the singular bou- and plural bouill-. If the singular stem ends in -d or -t, the third person singular omits the final -t. The other -clure verbs conclure, inclure, occlure 13 are conjugated like exclure, while there is a large class of verbs conjugated like rendre: Rule. Verbs ending in -endre, -andre, -ondre, -erdre, -ordre are conjugated like rendre.
Exception: prendre three stems prendje tu il, elle nous vous ils, elles. In a somewhat ironic twist, as -d was disappearing from the plurals, it was reintroduced into the spelling of the singulars, where it had long since ceased to be pronounced. The double -n in the third person plural is an orthographic device used to show that the preceding -e is not mute see Chapter 8.
Whenever -i appears between two vowels—both of which are pronounced—it changes to -y. Note that boire, which rhymes with croire, uses three completely different stems as illustrated earlier. English cognates of debere include debt, debit, and due, while -cevoir verbs correspond to English verbs ending in -ceive receive, conceive, etc. Fuir comes from Vulgar Latin fugire Classical fugere —source of English fugue, fugitive, refuge—and Latin g between vowels typically became -y in French e.
The double -t of the plural stem is shortened to a single -t in the singulars. All -indre verbs follow the same pattern: singular stem -in, plural stem -ign. The third person singulars for coudre and moudre show the same reduction dt S d as in il rend. These subsequently became coudre and moudre.
Redire has a similar conjugation, while other composites of dire have the normal -disez—with the exception of maudire, which as we have noted earlier is a Class II verb. Lire took its -s by analogy from dire, while that of circoncire came from circoncision. As for group vii , the -s in the plural conjugations has an etymological explanation. English connoisseur and reconnoiter Modern Fr. This has no etymological basis but is to distinguish the spelling—though not the pronunciation!
The transformations als S aux and alt S aut are regular occurrences in French. For example: mal sing. The conjugation of the irregular verb avoir is shown alongside savoir, since there are certain similarities. We will subsequently see that the similarities between these two verbs carry over to some of the other verb forms as well. As a result, such verbs use three separate stems for forming their present tense: Stem 1 Stem 2 Stem 3.
There are four groups to be considered. Apart from the vowel alternation, the singulars lose the stem consonant -v or -l of the plurals. It remains obligatory, however, in direct interrogation: Puis-je entrer? Note that mourir differs from all other two-stem verbs in that the vowel of the third person plural is that of the singulars, not that of the other two plurals. Apart from the vowel alternation, the singulars lose the stem consonant -v analogous to suivre and vivre.
The original vowel is maintained in English beverage. Tenir and venir have identical conjugations—in all verb tenses and forms. Note that the -n in the singular is not pronounced but serves instead to signal that the preceding -e is nasalized. Note that this is not a purely orthographic distinction: the dieresis 2 dots over the -i indicates that -ai in the plurals is to be pronounced as two separate vowels cf. The second conjugation is entirely parallel to that of voir. Among these are:. The more common use and form is italicized. Other defective verbs are presented in Annex C.
Why do many Class III verbs have different stem vowels je meus — nous mouvons, je viens — nous venons? As in the past participle vaincu. As a result, virtually all verbs whose stem vowel was in an open syllable found themselves in Old French with two different vowels, one for the four conjugations with the stress on the stem, the other for the two conjugations with the stress on the post-stem syllable.
In Modern French all such -er verbs have been completely regularized—in most cases using the nous-vous stem, in a few cases including pleurer using the je-tu-il-ils stem. By contrast, verbs whose stem vowel was in a closed syllable generally had completely regular conjugations in Old French. For example with stem vowels essentially. Recall that an open syllable is one ending in a vowel, while a closed syllable ends in a pronounced consonant. Modern French has regularized the verb with the plural stem parl-, while the longer stem remains in French and English parole.
How do the French verb endings -er, -oir, -re, -ir correspond to the three-fold division -ar, -er, -ir characteristic of most other major Romance languages? The contrasting evolution of four different Latin verbs is presented below the stressed syllable in the Latin verb is italicized. Spanish hablar, Mod.
Legal Notice - Costume jewelry | Les Néréides and N2 brands
Portuguese falar. French -er verbs thus correspond to -ar verbs in the other Romance languages and -oir and -re verbs to other Romance -er verbs,39 while -ir verbs are common to all Romance languages. A comparison with the other Romance languages is instructive: 3s. In French, the vowel disappeared from the ending of the singulars,40 providing a marked contrast with the other major Romance languages.
This was in fact an extension of the Latin practice of adding -scere to indicate the beginning of an action or process: e. Over time many additional inceptive verbs were created, referring to the process itself, not necessarily only to its beginning. Eventually they were created from adjectives and nouns as well e. In Old French, the -isc element became -iss in the three plurals e. Such French verbs are the basis for the -ish endings of English verbs: e. The -ish ending in English became so popular that it was applied to a number of verbs which had not been inceptive in either Latin or French: e.
Finally, with regard to the 16 -ir verbs which use -e endings e.
- Un été de canicule (HORS COLLECTION) (French Edition).
- For Better, For Worse.
- Select your language and place of delivery?
- The Church Has NOT Replaced Gods Israel: Putting Israel Back in the Picture;
- Cookies policy - Michelin Corporate!
The latter form was chosen in order to maintain orthographic consistency with the plural conjugations nous cueillons. Why do French verbs and words in general appear to have no stress accent i. Why are they usually shorter than the corresponding words in other Romance languages? As in English, in Latin each word had a syllable which was stressed. In each case, the stressed syllable is highlighted in bold. The imperfect tense and present participle are both constructed using the same stem: Rule. The stem used for both the imperfect tense and the present participle is the stem of the first person plural nous present tense conjugation, obtained by removing the ending -ons.
Thus for parler: endings parler Class I present nous parl-ons. Note that for all verbs, the imperfects for the three singulars and third person plural are pronounced identically. For impersonal or defective verbs which do. Stare is also the source for the now defective verb ester Annex C , which is in turn the origin of the English verb to stay.
These include:. Present participles ending in -guant and -quant have maintained these forms even though they should be written -gant and -cant according to the normal rules of French orthography see Chapter 8, Rule O Note that the -ent verbal adjective or noun is identical in appearance—but not in pronunciation!
The contrasting use of present participles and verbal adjectives, which can give rise to confusion, will be considered in Chapter We will begin with an overall summary. All Class II verbs 2 i. For Class III verbs the situation is far more complex. Nonetheless, by grouping these verbs by their infinitive endings, we can simplify things somewhat, particularly for -oir verbs. In the case of acquis, for example, the -is was historically part of the stem Lat.
In some cases these endings are added to the infinitive stem, in others to a truncated or otherwise altered one. All -i and -u endings are added to the infinitive stem: part ir S parti, ven ir S venu. Before proceeding to a detailed presentation, we need to take note of the fact that most past participles have plural and feminine forms.
Plural and Feminine Forms of the Past Participle The basic forms of the past participle presented above refer to the masculine singular past participle. The vast majority of verbs also have three other forms of the past participle: feminine singular, masculine plural, and feminine plural. With only one exception, the feminine singular is formed by adding -e to the corresponding masculine past participle.
The plurals are formed by adding an additional -s so that a feminine plural has an additional -es ; however, no -s is added to the plural of masculine -is or -us participles. There are a relatively small number of verbs e. It is neither necessary nor particularly useful to memorize which verbs these are: if a verb can be used in a situation in which a plural or feminine past participle is required see Chapter 10 , it is almost certain that such a form exists. The past participle for maudire is maudit, analogous to that of the other -dire verbs. All other verbs add -u to a truncated stem.
A number of verbs with similar present tense conjugations dire-lire, battre-mettre, suivre-vivre have markedly different past participles. These are the only non-er verbs with this past participle ending. Exceptions: prendre and mettre, which add -is to a truncated stem consisting of the initial consonant or consonant combination. As noted earlier, absoudre is the only French verb whose feminine past participle is not formed in a regular manner from the masculine. The past participles of faire and traire are fait and trait. Corresponding to English prison and mission.
The endings can be -it, -i, -is, or -u: reduced stem. The past participle ending is most commonly -it, the exceptions being nuire and luire, whose past participles end in -i. As in 7 above, in this group one can also distinguish between -it and -i verbs according to whether they are transitive or intransitive, respectively. In Old French, the past participles of both verbs ended in -it. The past participles for inclure and exclure are easily remembered: inclure includes the -s, exclure excludes it.
Remnants of the old past participles with -s can be seen in the derived words conclusion and exclusion, as well as in English sluice. Note that bouillir—whose present tense differs from other Class III -illir verbs— is no exception. It is easily remembered because of its similarity to English acquisition. Mort is easily remembered because of the related word mortal mortel in French , while couvert corresponds to English covert and covered.
There is generally a very close link between the form of the past participle and that of the simple past. For the purpose of the simple past, it is useful to partition verbs into the following six groups: 1. Using this partition, we can establish the following patterns for the simple past tense endings: group. Group 2: Past Participles Ending in -i, -is, or -it These verbs use -i simple past tense endings which, with three exceptions, are added to the past participle stem.
Note that all Class II verbs—i. The second person plural for dire is pronounced identically to the present vous dites. Group 3: Past Participles Ending in -u or -us The majority of verb types within this group use -u simple past endings, in each case added to the past participle stem.
Gérer un BDE : 10 compétences à valoriser sur votre CV - L'Etudiant
For avoir, as for its past participle eu, the initial e- in the simple past is a relic and is not pronounced. For all of the verbs shifting to -i endings, the past participle stem is used:. Note that je vis, tu vis, il vit can be either the simple past of voir or the present of vivre. Group 4: Past Participles Ending in -rt Couvrir and related verbs uses -i endings; mourir uses -u endings. Group 5: -indre Verbs All of these verbs have -i simple past endings, added to the present plural stem nous plaignons, peignons, joignons rather than to the past participle stem:.
To form the future and conditional tenses, these endings are added to a common stem, which we will call the future stem. General patterns for the future stem: 1. Note that: 1. The endings for the conditional tense are identical to those of the imperfect tense of avoir and all other verbs.
For the conditional, the three singulars and third person plural are pronounced the same. The irregular future stem for envoyer and renvoyer arose from the perceived relationship with voir, whose future stem is verr-. Entrevoir and revoir follow the example of voir, with irregular stems entreverr- and reverr-. In both avoir and savoir, the avoir becomes aur-. Thus, falr- became faldr- and eventually faudr-, and similarly for the other two. Appendix Historical and Methodological Note The Latin future tense died, leaving almost no trace in the successor Romance languages.
I will wash mine hands in innocency. Psalms 26 Similarly, I have to go to Rome tomorrow is not too distant in meaning from I am going will go to Rome tomorrow.
The Romance development of the future tense led naturally to the development of a future in the past by replacing the present of the verb avoir with the imperfect. The formation of the present subjunctive is governed by the following rule. The present subjunctive for the three singulars and third person plural uses the 3p ils present stem, while the 1p nous stem is used for the first and second person plurals. Present subjunctives are thus divided into two groups, according to whether they have one or two stems.
Examples: voir croire mouvoir ils voi-ent croi-ent meuv-ent nous voy-ons croy-ons mouv-ons je tu il, elle. Note that apart from the nine exceptions given below : a The present subjunctive for the third person plural is always equal to the corresponding present indicative. This is also the case for the 16 -ir verbs which have -e endings in the present indicative e. Subjunctive: Imperfect Tense The imperfect subjunctive is completely determined by the corresponding form of the simple past: 1 the stem is identical to that of the simple past; 2 the endings correspond to those used for the simple past, as indicated in the table below.
The third person plural is identical to both the present subjunctive and the present indicative e. Unlike other conjugated verb forms, personal pronouns are not used with the imperative:2 Viens avec moi! Ne faites pas de bruit! Imperatives for the first and second person plurals are identical to the corresponding present tense indicative. For the second person singular,-er verbs including aller lose the final -s of the present indicative.
The same occurs for the 16 -ir verbs which use -e endings for their present tense. For all other verbs, the second person singular imperative is identical to the corresponding present indicative. Note that: a The second person plural for dire and faire reproduces the irregularity of the present tense and hence is consistent with the above rule.
The more common form uses the stem veuill- the nous form does not exist. Compound verb tenses are formed by using the past participle, along with the appropriate form of an auxiliary verb. With the virtual disappearance from the spoken language of the simple past and imperfect subjunctive, the past anterior and past perfect subjunctive have likewise fallen out of use. The past imperative is very rare.
In some cases, the same verb can be used in different contexts with either auxiliary: Il est sorti. Il a sorti les valises. Ils sont sortis. The e is included if the subject is feminine,1 the s if vous is plural. It is formed analogously to the. While its use is shunned by many authorities and speakers, it is widely used in certain regions.
Or le plus-que-parfait du subjonctif. Past imperative is somewhat of a misnomer, since as an imperative it can refer only to the future. They can be divided into the following categories:. Doubling of Stem Consonant in 21 Conjugations e. They affect all -er verbs with a stem vowel -e which is in an open syllable and has no written accent;2 i. From the Introduction we recall that an open syllable is one ending in a vowel, a closed syllable one ending in a pronounced consonant. Some examples: spelling. With very few exceptions, the following rules apply: Rule O French -e in open syllables is always mute,unless it has a written accent acute, grave, or circumflex.
Rule O French does not tolerate mute -e in successive syllables. For such verbs, the normally mute stem vowel -e is pronounced in the 21 conjugations in which the following vowel is a mute -e. The present subjunctive and imperative follow the pattern of the present indicative, the conditional that of the future. A partial answer is provided by the following rule: Rule O If the stem consonant is not -l or -t, then the second remedy grave accent is used. In cases in which this rule does not apply i. The overall situation is summarized below: stem consonant.
Under the entries for appeler a and jeter b. Interpeller has a pronunciation entirely analogous to that of appeler yet is conjugated with -ll in all conjugations model parler. Both approaches have their supporters. The conjugation is thus entirely analogous to that of parler. Nonetheless, these verbs encounter problems due to the following rule. The written accent is altered in the same four conjugations of the present subjunctive, as well as the tu form of the imperative, thus making a total of nine written accent shifts.
Why not? Thus for the future: theoretically pronounced like je tu il, elle nous vous ils, elles. The present tense conjugations of the three groups are shown below: present indicative. Whenever -y is followed by a mute -e, it changes its pronunciation and orthography to -i.
If there is a preceding vowel, the orthography changes from -i to -y; otherwise there is no change. The same process literally occurs twice in combinations of -ii plus pronounced vowel: Rule O If there is a preceding vowel, the orthography of the first -i changes to -y; otherwise there is no change. Now we can return to the -yer verbs. In conformity with Rule O-7, -y becomes -i in the 21 conjugations in which the following vowel is a mute -e. For -ayer. Two Concluding Points 1. This is consistent with the following general system, which characterizes French orthography.
Of the six -eyer verbs, the most commonly employed is the English import volleyer. For vaincre, the shift c S qu accounts for present tense vainquez and vainquent and for the simple past stem vainqu-: the letter which follows in each case is -e or -i. This is illustrated below for the present tenses of fatiguer and marquer: je tu il, elle nous vous ils, elles. From the point of view of French orthography, these are considered irregular verbs.
From the point of view of appearance, however, they are completely regular since they have the same stem for all 48 conjugations. Envoyer combines b with an irregular future stem. These are:2 0. For nos. The key stems can be used to construct the remaining 41 simple forms, as follows all exceptions noted : present indicative. There are nonetheless some useful local patterns which apply to the -oir, -re, and -ir subgroups. The group consists of all verbs ending in -ndre, apart from the -prendre and -indre verbs. Note that in the present singulars the second consonant is lost je pars, sors, sens, sers, dors.
The annexes at the end of the book provide additional information on verb forms. Annex A is divided into three parts: A1: a list of model verbs corresponding to categories into which all French verbs can be placed. Other verbs sharing the same model are explicitly identified. Annex B provides an alphabetical listing of approximately 6, verbs, identifying for each the model which it follows. We begin with a brief review of several key grammatical concepts.
A transitive verb is one which is capable of having a direct object. Other verbs are intransitive. To throw and to give are transitive verbs: We throw the ball. He gives the book to his friend. The ball and the book are direct objects, his friend an indirect object. In contrast, to go and to yawn are at least normally 1 intransitive verbs. I go home. He yawns. While home is normally a noun, in this case it is an adverb where? Le roi pardonne ses crimes. Nous montons les escaliers lentement.
As in English, the present tense can also on occasion be used to describe future activities. Je vais en France. This can be viewed as a special case of the rules introduced later in this chapter governing agreement with a preceding direct object. The choice of auxiliary is considerably easier to resolve and is also far more important.
The current rule, completely artificial, is based on a usage which some may find respectable, but which is completely illogical and for that reason particularly fragile. The basic features of these categories are described below, while the appendix to this chapter attempts to shed light on why such differences exist. The past participle accords with the subject i. The most common are listed below:.
Brunot and Bruneau These are typically remembered by the various things that one can do in a house— or perhaps hospital: enter, go up the stairs, go down the stairs maybe by falling , go out the door, be born, die, and so forth. Il est devenu un grand acteur. Marie Antoinette est morte en The unifying element is that all of these are intransitive verbs of motion or transformation. The verbs marked with an asterisk in the list above can also be used transitively i.
Non, mais son mari a descendu ses valises. This is in fact an illustration of a more general phenomenon affecting a relatively large number of intransitive verbs and will be considered further in the appendix to this chapter. There is no accord between the past participle and subject. On the other hand, when there is a direct object which precedes the verb there is normally accord between the past participle and the direct object. If the preceding direct object is the active subject of the.
In the second pair, however, one cannot say the theatrical work performs: rather the theatrical work is performed passive. Marie se lave avec du savon. Nous nous lavons avec du savon. Je me donne au travail. Jean et Marie se sourient. Nous nous sourions. For laisser this is a relatively new rule, and there is still much disagreement. TO each other ind. Group c consists of intransitive verbs: the extra pronoun represents in French, though not necessarily always in English an indirect object. For the purposes of this exposition we will call them inseparable verbs.
Thus, for donner: Je me donne un cadeau. The accord of the past participle is more complicated. Rule 1. Rule 2. In which case, as we will see below, se becomes an indirect object pronoun. In each of the examples on the right, the object pronoun me, te, se, nous, vous, se serves as a direct object. In Marie se lave les mains avec du savon. Elles se sont souvenues de toi. Ces livres se sont bien vendus. Ils se sont nui. Elles se sont plu. Ils se sont souri. Ils se sont rendu compte de leur erreur.
Ils se sont construit une maison. Imperfect As noted in the Introduction, the imperfect does not correspond directly to any simple English verb form. And the famine waxed sore in the land of Egypt. These clauses will be considered in greater detail at a later stage. Perhaps the most common use of the past perfect is referring to past hypothetical situations in an if. Les enfants sont sortis en courant. The last example is the French equivalent of the proverb practice makes perfect. It was not until that the distinction between invariable present participle and variable verbal adjective was formalized.
Appelle-moi quand il arrivera. Vous pouvez venir quand vous voudrez. The future tense is used in the then part of if. Alternative Forms of the Future In English, the future tense is often replaced by a more informal construction using the verb to go, particularly when the future being referred to is not too distant: future: near-future:. Je ferai mes devoirs demain.