Get e-book The Philosophy of Humanism and of Other Subjects

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Philosophy of Humanism and of Other Subjects file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Philosophy of Humanism and of Other Subjects book. Happy reading The Philosophy of Humanism and of Other Subjects Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Philosophy of Humanism and of Other Subjects at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Philosophy of Humanism and of Other Subjects Pocket Guide.

The key to all knowledge. The key to all educational methods. The key to all educational purposes. Special implications for creationists — Public education denies existence of God, the validity of supernatural revelation i. The creation worldview is now beginning to threaten the philosophical foundation of all modern public education. Documents of humanism emphasize evolutionary beliefs.

I. Definition

It is the integrating factor of all life for humanists. It is supposedly scientific. Therefore, it tends to make humanism creditable. Conclusion: Therefore, humanism is now taught in all public schools, to the degree, at least, that the theory of evolution is the philosophy under girding educational content, methods, and purposes. Argument and Evidence Re-Enforced To realize the extent to which modern public education is humanistic that is, anti-theistic imagine what public education would be like if it were theistic.

That is. If creation were the key to all educational subjects. If creation were the key to all educational methods. If creation were the key to all educational purposes. Argument and Evidence Expanded. Major Premise: All public schools now teach the theory of evolution. This is the philosophy of evolution. When creationists propose, however, that creation be taught in the schools along with evolution, evolutionists commonly react emotionally, rather than scientifically. That all public schools now teach an evolutionary view of origins is so evidently true that should anyone declare otherwise he would likely not be considered creditable by professional educators.

Since the Scopes Trial at Dayton, Tennessee in , evolutionary teachings have become the norm in all public schools in America. Although it may be argued that a majority of Americans believe in creation rather than in evolution, and although preachers sometimes give sermons against believing in evolutionary doctrines, the theists, as a whole, have done very little to protest the teaching of evolution in public schools.

The Humanist Approach to Learning

The first significant blast in the last half-century against the theory of evolution was in when John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris published their book, The Genesis Flood. The result is that creationists and evolutionists are now locked in legal, educational, and polemical battles throughout America. Whereas creation and the theistic worldview were once dominant in American public schools, they are, for all practical purposes, now legally excluded.

Evolution and the humanistic worldview occupies the high ground. Evolutionists characterize their beliefs as scientific, while they characterize creation as religious and therefore unscientific. But evolutionism is as much a religion as is so-called creationism. Moreover, creationists generally believe that the case for creation can be better established by arguments from scientific data than can the case for evolution. Even so, evolutionists are determined that creation not be given equal hearing with evolution in public schools.

Creationists have debated evolutionists in public forums, and have generally gained more favorable reception from their audiences than have evolutionists. The result, however, is that evolutionists are now hesitating to debate creationists publicly. In judicial arenas, however, creationists are generally defeated, not by the evidence, but seemingly by prejudices of the judiciary. The educational establishment does everything in its legal power to keep creationists from presenting scientific data for its view of origins.

Court cases in Arkansas and Louisiana have demonstrated that the teaching of creation is not acceptable in public schools. Creationists, generally, see the battle to get creation taught alongside evolution as the major battle for Christian faith in public schools. Nor is it to legalize prayers or bible readings in schools. The real issue is: Which worldview — creation or evolution — will serve as the philosophical foundation for public education?

Creationists have long since lost the major battle for Christian faith in public schools.

Renaissance Humanism

And most creationists do not even know what it was, when it happened, nor how. It happened when the proponents of evolution devised and superimposed their own worldview upon American public education. It happened when John Dewey, G. Thorndike, John B. Watson and other educational philosophers and psychologists of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries exchanged the Bible for the Darwinian theory of evolution as the foundation of all knowledge.

The theory of evolution also became the philosophy under girding instructional methods and educational purposes. This happened without theists, generally, even being aware that there was a battle to be fought. Creationists lost! The study of origins is important, but not especially because it provides the framework for studies in biological sciences.

It also determines educational methods and purposes. In public education, the theory of evolution is now considered to be, at least in theory, the key to all knowledge. To believe in the creation of our natural universe requires belief in a supernatural being who has power and purposes greater than what is demonstrated by the natural universe. To believe in evolution requires belief in a self-existing universe.

It requires belief that this natural universe is all that exists, that it evolves by chance and that all things are only physical. For evolutionists, nothing is spiritual or eternal. The physical sciences — biology, chemistry, geology, astronomy, etc. Did God create the heavens and the earth and all things in them?

Psalm ; Romans ; 1 Corinthians ; Hebrews ; Did creation occur in a seven-day week as declared by scripture? Genesis ; Exodus Or has a self-existing universe evolved over billions of years to become what it now is? Does nature operate only by chance? The social sciences — psychology, sociology, politics, etc. Modern historians are generally committed to doctrinaire evolutionary concepts in the interpretation of both ancient and modern history. They see no place for God to work in the affairs of mankind in either biblical or contemporary history. Therefore, for them, biblical history must be considered as saga, legend, or myth.

In the teaching of ethical and moral values — truth, honesty, decency, etc. If all things evolve by chance, then there are no absolutes, all things must be relative. Right and wrong are always flexible according to current social standards. One can therefore act in whatever manner may be desired by himself or his society. On the other hand, if God created mankind and holds mankind accountable to a consistent, universal standard, then there are absolutes. The major philosophies — whether political, psychological, sociological, etc. These are all taught in public schools.

All modern public education is anti-biblical and anti-theistic to the extent that all subjects taught in public schools presuppose that all things evolved. Even in such subjects as speech, math, meteorology, etc. Evolutionary presuppositions in modern education require an automatic rejection of a supernatural God who created and sustains all things. It requires rejection of supernatural revelation about God and all other aspects of reality.

And it requires rejection of the spiritual nature of man. In public education, the theory of evolution is now considered to be, at least in theory, the key to all instructional methods. The theory of evolution is not only the philosophical foundation for all subject content taught in public schools, it is also the psychological basis, at least in theory, for all instructional methods now used in public schools.

Psychology is the study of the human mind as demonstrated by human behavior.

The workings of the mind are important for both teaching and learning. Educators want to know how the mind works in order that teachers may guide students effectively in the learning process. Conclusions derived from studying the mind are largely dependent upon presuppositions or assumptions brought to the study of the mind. Creationists generally believe that the mind of mankind is distinct from the brain and that it is somehow related to the spiritual nature of humanity. In order for that to be, his memory, a faculty of the mind, had to have existence beyond the life of the human body.

Thus, biblically speaking, the human mind is something more than physical. Evolutionists, on the other hand, believe that human beings are only physical, and that human minds are only physical. The mind is not distinct from the brain. Mind and brain are but one and the same. For evolutionists, the mind is not a special faculty capable of receiving ideas.

Rather it is merely an ability that has evolved, like any other ability, to help a human being to adapt to his or her environment. These differing presuppositions are directly related to instructional methods. Because creationists and evolutionists differ in their presuppositions regarding human nature and the nature of the human mind, they logically differ in their educational methodologies. Although public schools in America were once mostly theistic, with the coming of evolution and with its adaptation as the root source of educational philosophy and psychology, public schools became humanistic.

Modern public education, often referred to as progressive education, is but the application of ideas derived from evolution as the basis for instructional methods. Progressive education grew out of the new experimental psychology based on the belief that man is an animal, a product of evolution with common ancestry with the ape, and could therefore be studied like any other animal.

Haeckel was also responsible for the idea that during embryological development higher organisms like man relived their evolutionary history — that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. That hypothesis has since been proven false, but it has become the basis of the way reading is taught in most American schools. The look-say method of teaching reading was promoted by the progressives on the ground that children should go through the different stages that the human race went through in learning to read: pictography, ideographs, and finally the alphabet.

All educational psychology and most other psychology also is based on the theory of evolution. Watson, derived from Charles Darwin the stimulus-response techniques now used in teaching. His instincts, that is his inborn tendencies to feel and act in certain ways, show though out marks of kinship with the lower animals, especially with our nearest relatives physically, the monkeys. His sense-powers show no new creation. His intellect we have seen to be a simple though extended variation from the general animal sort. This again is presaged by the similar variation in the case of the monkeys.

Amongst the minds of animals that of man leads, not as a demigod from another planet, but as a king from the same race. In public education, the theory of evolution is now considered to be, at least in theory, the key to all educational purposes. Because creationists believe that mankind is both physical and spiritual, creationists are concerned with truth, and with the acquisition and use of knowledge for both time and eternity. Creationists are interested in children knowing all things needful to become independent of their parents, to lead faithful Christian lives, and to build their own Christian homes.

Creationists are interested in educating for both time and eternity. For creationists, learning relies primarily on use of cognitive skills. On the other hand, because evolutionists believe that mankind is only physical, evolutionists are not so much concerned about imparting knowledge to children as they are teaching children how to solve social problems, to adapt to their physical and social environments. Evolutionists are interested in teaching children things that relate only to time — not to eternity — things like self-realization, social adjustment, and financial success.

The stimulus response techniques now used in teaching is indicative of changes in the purposes of education. Americans have traditionally believed that schools were to foster the intellectual development of children by teaching them basic skills. They were to cultivate their minds through study of systematic knowledge produced through the centuries, and to instill an understanding of their heritage and culture. However, modern educational philosophy intents for schools to modify behavior and to inculcate evolutionary values and vacillating emotional adjustments. Some educational philosophers have gone so far as to redefine education as therapy.

Every teacher must be regarded as a facilitator or psycho-therapist. And every child in the classroom must be regarded as a patient. In public education, the theory of evolution is increasingly becoming, in actual practice, the key to all knowledge, all instructional methods, and all educational purposes. And they are right. The fact is that the theory of evolution is, by design, worked into textbooks and other curriculum guides.

When schoolteachers follow those guides, and they must at least to some degree, then they, however unconscious of it they may be, are implementing the intentions of educational philosophers and psychologists. The change has come gradually, but it is now accelerating faster because evolutionists now have a stronger hold on the educational system.

Advocating progressive values and equality for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers

Conclusion of Major Premise. The current creation-evolution controversy is a surprise to evolutionists and to the educational establishment.

The unforeseen possibility that creation might now be allowed equal hearing with evolution, even if only in biology classes, is a genuine threat to them. Should creationists win adherents, if only in biology classrooms, then it would not be long before creation would become a threat to evolutionism in public schools, not only as the way all things originated, but more significantly, as the philosophical foundation for all subject content, teaching methods and educational purposes.

Evolutionists, and the educational establishment, are not about to risk that possibility. If, in the teaching of origins in biology classes, equal treatment were to be given to alternative perspectives, i. However, this would not be equal treatment, not even in biology, because evolutionism would still be the philosophical foundation for other aspects of biology curriculum. Moreover, evolutionism would continue to be the philosophical foundation for all subject content, methods, and purposes in all other courses at all grade levels.

The two philosophical systems — creation and evolutionism — are incompatible. Neither can tolerate the other. Either one or the other will prevail in public education. Evolutionism is now in control. Theistic parents must awaken to the danger which evolutionism presents to the faith of their children. The threat is very real. In defense of theistic families who send their children to public schools, and also of theistic school administrators and teachers who are employed by public schools, it may be said, theists, generally, are not consciously aware that evolution is the root source of educational philosophy and psychology in American today.

While many theists in the teaching profession may sense the undesirability of evolutionary assumptions within their own curriculum content, teaching methods and purposes, and while they may therefore alter it in accordance with their own theistic perspectives, they cannot thereby overcome the strong hold that evolution has upon public education.

With each passing generation, the strength of evolution becomes more firmly entrenched in public schools. Evolutionary ideas are fundamental to modern humanism. The first four of fifteen articles in the first Humanist Manifesto emphasize evolutionary beliefs. The individual born into a particular culture is largely molded to that culture. The second Humanist Manifesto also acknowledges the importance of evolution, but not as strongly. Nature may indeed be broader and deeper than we now know; any new discoveries, however, will but enlarge our knowledge of the natural.

There may be some significant differences among scientists concerning the mechanics of evolution; yet the evolution of the species is supported so strongly by the weight of evidence that it is difficult to reject it. Accordingly, we deplore the efforts by fundamentalists especially in the United States to invade the science classrooms, requiring that creationists theory be taught to students and requiring that it be included in biology textbooks. This is a serious threat both to academic freedom and to the integrity of the educational process. Significance of the theory of evolution to humanism.

The significance of the theory of evolution to the philosophy of humanism may be declared in at least three ways. First, it is the foundation faith tenent of the religion of humanism. The contribution of humanists to RE is enormous. For example, in England :.

Outline of humanism - Wikipedia

The last major survey of the extent to which Humanism is included in English locally agreed syllabuses was carried out in This found that 62 of 80 syllabuses include Humanism. The level of inclusion of Humanism in syllabuses today is higher. The latest RE Subject Framework therefore represents no revolution, only an extension of a decades-long trend. The phrase is meant to be inclusive. I hope the document will be useful to all those seeking to provide RE of the highest quality for young people in our schools. Remember me. Sign up to email updates. In its report RE, Attainment and National Curriculum , the Religious Education Council set out the standard case for inclusion: RE should be open to all pupils regardless of their beliefs.

Indeed if pupils did not learn this, it could be said they were victims of indoctrination. Many pupils come from non-religious backgrounds and probably share some of the views humanists express. Know about and understand a range of religions and worldviews; B. Express ideas and insights about the nature, significance and impact of religions and worldviews; C. The Exemplifying learner profiles at Key Stages 2 and 3 in religious education: Additional guidance also emphasises the importance of learning about non-religious beliefs, and cites a number of examples.

More in this section. Faith schools. We want pupils from all different backgrounds educated together in a shared environment, rather than separated according to the religious beliefs of their parents. Find out more. We want a country where institutions such as Parliament are separate from religious organisations, and everyone is treated equally, regardless of their beliefs. Human rights and equality. As humanists, we support the right of every person to be treated with dignity and respect, and to be allowed to speak, and believe, as they wish.